Tuesday, September 30, 2008

good news

endeavoring to provide a better example for today's gridlocked politicians in washington, and in addition to several highly productive work-related conference calls, i've mastered the chord progressions to "angel on my shoulder" on both the ukulele and the guitar. (the uke sounds better, but the frets are just so GD tiny...) f fits my voice best, but that's like saying "executive decision" was marla maples best film work. (though, to her credit, i will say that it takes real effort to provide the worst performance in a steven seagal movie, and she doesn't disappoint).

"i'd tell you but the story gets worse--OHhh"

:-)

Monday, September 29, 2008

playing politics

i've been trading emails with an o'reilly-loving friend who has (finally!) been able to admit he was wr... wr... wrong about supporting bush. (it took until this very week, which is amazing, too). however, his partially-opened eyes have not yet opened to the point where he can say any such thing without immediately starting in on a rant about how chris dodd and barney frank gave away the farm on the community reinvestment act under the approving administration of bill clinton, and how it's specifically the dem's fault that fannie and freddit were allowed to lend beyond reasonable capitalizations without any effective oversight whatsoever.

and it occurred to me, under the auspices of lies, damned lies, and statistics, that opinion poll approval ratings of the president and congress being at historical lows does not begin to capture the true scope, depth and nature of our problems, or our adversaries. lets face it--half the country blames the democrats for their obvious and inexcusable malfeasances, (of which there are legion, from the CRA to Fannie and Freddie to not filibustering in outrage when funding for this atrocious "war" in iraq, which is little more than sovereign oppression of the iraqi people little different from that under sadaam, except there's more random violence these days, but, oops, there i go being partisan), while the other half is busy sputtering its outrage at the republicans for theirs. (the party of gay airport bathroom sex persecuting the party of what was then the most powerful man in the free world for an extracurricular blowjob or two is pretty rich, but then there's jack abramoff and an attorney general who steadfastly does not recall anything but advocating executive privilege as justification for torture, and the list goes on from there).

ok, so everybody is growing to realize that bush is a catastrophe of epic proportions. and everybody, when asked, will say that congress is a septic sinkhole of a sewer, too. that's what we read from those polls, right? but the real question is not how loathesome do you/we believe bush and the partisans of capital hill to be, but how clearly do you/we realize that it's our present party system that's the ultimate scourge, and which has to be eradicated or we'll never legislate our way out of this morass.

here's how i see it: dodd and frank and the dems want affordable mortgages for the common people, though, ostensibly, and the pac money doesn't lie, they really just want to continue to be re-elected. so they need the republicans to give free reign to fannie and freddie (i.e. no oversight and relaxed capital controls so those folks can increase their leverage and afford to make more and more campaign contributions to their pet congresspeople) and they further want billions of dollars to fund community reinvestment initiatives like ACORN and the like, which really just pays off their inner-city grass-roots campaign folks with a lot of free money, and more and better re-election campaigns. of course, the republicans rightly recognize this as the country's economic suicide, as well as a fetid stinking pile of corruption in the making. (and they continue to be, of course, right about all of that). yet...

gramm and company want continued global economic hegemony over the financial services industry for the glory and profit of the good ol' u s of a, though, ostensibly, and the pac money doesn't lie, they really just want to continue to be re-elected. so they need the democrats to give free reign to wall street (i.e. no oversight and relaxed capital controls so those folks can increase their leverage and afford to make more and more and more campaign contributions to their pet congresspeople) and they further want billions of dollars to invade iraq, which really just pays off their military-industrial complex buddies with lots of free money, and more and better re-election campaigns. of course, the democrats rightly recognize this as the country's economic suicide, as well as a fetid stinking pile of corruption in the making. (and they continue to be, of course, right about all of that). yet...

the very fact that half the people vehemently oppose the other half is exactly what allows BOTH halves to do the exact opposite of what they should. to "liberate" fannie and freddie, the dems agreed to "liberate" wall street. and to "liberate" wall street, the reps agreed to "liberate" fannie and freddie. after all, that's what the lobbyists paid them to do--liberate their pet causes--and that's exactly what they accomplished. can you say rico statutes and where are the tmen???

it's like coke and pepsi, with the american taxpayers being either the equivalent of rc cola, or, perhaps, more accurately, the kids with all the nutrition, teeth and money problems for having to pay for the agency of their own destruction.

it's like "heads i win, tails you lose" from the playground bully and dozens of his largest and cruelest friends while all you wanted to do was make it home without getting a wedgie today.

it's like we're all so incredibly stupid that we continue to give our votes to our favored ideologues because we're all terrified that if our favored ideologues don't win, then something worse will happen. and we end up getting campaign ads that say nothing more enlightening than obama will raise your taxes, and that john mccain will be nothing better than four more years of bush.

guess what.

it can't get worse.

our taxes are going to go up, and there, indeed, is nothing better than four more years of bush waiting for us unless we do something different with our voices and our votes.

term limits, taxation limits, government power limits, (i.e. strong defense of the bill of rights and our constitution), and hyperbole limits. that's what i'm looking for. that and someone to drive while i drink this weekend.

help wanted

since scooterman isn't going to be there when i need him this weekend, i'll be looking for an entrepreneur with a drivers license and a willingness to sit happily by while others drink and talk about stuff that would otherwise bore the paint off a wall. (first it'll be all of high school, then, at the oktoberfest, it'll be the goal i didn't score this weekend on a great chance, and, yeah, the boys will be merciless, which, i suppose, wouldn't be as boring to some, though, while i'm thinking of it, i don't think my ex stays up that late on weekends).

all the perrier and bratwurst you can drink and eat...

OC haircut math

i'm sporting a haircut as short as any i've had since elementary school, and, beatles be damned, i'm liking it. i'm also liking the way it potentially can save me from the $20 do every couple of months (it's a frugal swamp yankee thing) except that the $7 razor cuts one can get on various lowell streetcorners are going to need far more frequent updates, and i'm suspicious the final costs are going to be running more or less the same either way.

of course, in a world where personal service is a common gift between friends, it also occurs to me that pressing a willing (preferably female) friend into service might solve the entire problem. after all, it's very hard not to do a perfect job when it's a case of just running to buzzers all over until everything is even, plus, when said friend might be female, it's also possible to recreate the not-so-subtle pleasure of having both a breast and that indescribable scent in close facial proximity, which is, freud and all personal observation confirmed, what guys really want in the first place. (i can't speak for girls, though i'm not discounting some consistency on this). truth be told, i think it's a pretty large part of what has me paying $20 for a haircut in the first place (if you experienced her leaning in during a shampoo you'd know what i mean, and geez isn't this the skeeviest and most lecherous posting i've ever made) and i won't ignore it as a relevant factor in my final choice.

but, alas, if you only knew...

the real reason i love this haircut so much is that it's the first look that's complemented the close-to-completely-grey beard to the point where i'm comfortable not shaving once again. which is to say, i'm *always* most comfortable not dragging a razor over my face, but i'm just slightly too concerned about the business ramifications (there are no old men doing what i do, though vanity isn't absent in the calculations) to get scraggly willy-nilly. with neat, close-cropped hair, the effect of shockingly white facial hair somehow doesn't seem as jarring. or maybe i'm just wishin'...

either way, the look for the 30th high school reunion this weekend is a lock. the reunion shindig conflicts with a friend's annual oktoberfest bash, but i've been thinking about just showing up at the keg party "fashionably late", i.e. at 1am, which is when all the serious drinking gets done, anyway. who knows, maybe there'll be a mouse or two giving me the "i always thought you were cute" song and dance at the reunion, and i'll be bringing more than just beer to the real party.

which brings me around to the *real* point of this whole post: scooterman. is this or is this not the most brilliant business plan ever invented. owning the lowell, ma, us franchise (with melvern taylor as the musical spokesperson, natch) may just have to be my next business move. "i'm not only the president, i'm also a client".

Saturday, September 27, 2008

taste

one of the most telling revelations about our sense of taste is how prejudiced we are in favor of "new". i discovered the tip of that iceberg when i fell in love with black and white movies, and learned that very few people in the world raised on color tv could watch one and actually see the human beings in it for who and what they were. (the fact that starz and showtime can charge folks 8 or 10 bucks a month for little more than the privilege of seeing the same thing a couple of weeks ahead of everybody else is pretty eloquent on that subject, too).

but when i see dolores moran in to have an have not, i see both one of the most beautiful women i've ever seen, as well as an entire world whose tastes are as changeable as tomorrow's people magazine. ok, maybe that's a bit harsh. but we all know the experience of re-encountering something or someone we used to really like, and feeling the present day's "not so much". (likely mixed with a little knot in the stomach and accompanying voice inside the head asking something to the effect of "what were you thinking???")

me, i think the ultimate goal in life is to put the greatest amount of distance possible between us and the potential most-recent cause for that inner "ugh". (or, as they first put it on wall of the temple of apollo at delphi, "know thyself").

the calendar on me, i'm pleased to say, is so far clean since moving out of the house a year ago. lowell, melvern taylor and zaftig may all, in time, turn on me, but i'm figuring not. the key, i think, is placing affection for someone or something in its proper proportion. if you find yourself less hot on someone or something as time goes by, then i'm quite sure the problem isn't with your present self or perception, but, rather, with your prior. and if someone or something you've always loved grows on you and fills you with ever more joy each passing day, well, then, that's your life's true love, isn't it.

fresh-from-the-cow (whole) milk on cheerios. now THAT's what i'm talking about.

Friday, September 26, 2008

da football man

if the new england patriots ever had a tim wakefield, it would have to be troy brown. nope, troy never came close to stanley morgan's team record for receiving yards, (stanley morgan being my vote for the greatest patriot player ever--currently crippled quarterbacks included--and who else in nfl history has 10,000 receiving yards and has averaged over 19 per catch, and that answer would be nobody), but by sheer persistence and game, troy holds the pats record for most receptions, and i hope he never loses it. (how many players could make a guy like randy moss into the *second* best receiver on a team to ever come from marshall university). toss in punt returns, kick returns, and a couple of seasons filling in at defensive back (3 int's is a good season for most natural defenders, let alone for a converted wide receiver universally regarded as too slow even to play on the offensive side of the ball) and you have what amounts to a true renaissance man who remains the epitome of TEAM. the guy even won an award as part of a united way tv commercial. ("bingo--i've got bingo").

here's to you troy--you da football man.

the worst gets worse

i'd hate to get into a pot vs. kettle argument on these two, but i missed something awhile back that is just plain incredible:

from the ap


incredible.

to shifty's credit, our inarticulate would-be veepster did draft the 1994 violence against women act, (even a stopped clock can be right twice a day), including provisions to make states ineligible for federal grant money if they charged rape victims for exams and the kits to conduct them, which is a good thing, since the ak legislature moved to overrule palin's police force on the policy.

(one more word to those concerned--senator mccain actually voted *against* the act, so at least his ticket would appear consistent on the issue...)

the two worst--i'm not kidding

here's another characteristic moment with joe son-of-a-car-salesman.

"i'll try to find you some and i'll bring 'em to ya"

here's sarah palin's best attempt to answer the direct question: name some examples where john mccain has supported financial services regulation. (gives me bad flashbacks to all the worst software salesmen with whom i've ever worked).

i tell ya, these veep picks are the hands-down worst in history--it's like we've got TWO dan quayles running here.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

ELEVEN FUCKING ZEROS

as i typed that phrase just a moment ago i was overwhelmed by its staggering magnitude. has the world gone mad, that the party of so-called small government would be so eager to write a check so incredibly huge???

our national debt is almost 10 trillion dollars. each and every citizen, from every fresh-faced baby to every wizened deathbed senior citizen, already owes a share that's over $32,000 and climbing. (only a fraction of us citizens actually have jobs from which that all has to be paid back, which makes the figure even more incredible). so now, with one fell swoop of a pen, dubya wants to tack on another THREE GRAND from each and every one of us, handed carte blanche to the same shysters and thieves who ran up the tab in the first place. and, worst of all, after all that money pours out into the sewer, we're still going to owe all the bad debts buried within those fraudulent balance sheets, too, and we have no idea how large that number even is.

ARE WE CRAZY???

yeah, i know, catastrophe soon follows if we let the financial dominoes topple...

but, you know what? today i'm feeling my principles, and the tug of the pickpocket's hand on my wallet. and if it were only my own, i might even let go of it... but that's not really my wallet at all... it's my kids'. theirs. our whole "of the people, by the people, for the people" system's. when we go bankrupt, and are owned by the chinese and the arabs and whoever else has free cash in their oil-enriched sovereign wealth funds, (russia may yet still win the cold war, people), there won't be any "last, best hope of earth" left to stand, will there.

no reward for fraud. no blood for oil. (you go t. boone: energy independence in 10 years). no doing a second wrong in pursuit of what's right. we know what's right.

tighten your belts. we're at war. (as walt kelly once said, "we've met the enemy, and he is us").

allegory

imagine one of your kids has just crashed their car driving drunk (perhaps not even for the first time) and he or she is in jail and on the phone to you: "hey ma/pa, you gotta bail me out, and can you advance me a few thou on some new wheels?".

do you trudge down to the station with your almost-maxed-out atm card and give 'em everything they're asking? (no joke, in hudson, nh they've got a machine right in the lobby). or do you tough-love 'em a little bit with a lecture and a night in the pokey?

i think that's right about where we are with the proposed bush bailout. the dems wouldn't allow driving sober with fannie and freddie, (perennially refused attempts to regulate their sacred mortgages-for-the-common-people cows), and the republicans purloined the keys to a rocket-sled porsche during frat party weekend (phil gramm's pet repeal of glass-steagal effectively removing the regulatory brakes at the same time) and it's all smoke and twisted metal down on dead man's curve.

maybe it's because i was raised the way i was--you gotta know i'd have spent the weekend on the hospitality of the local constabulary and would still be paying off the car payments on the wreck to this day--but it's hard for me to stomach rewarding catastrophic greed and malfeasance with a check containing ELEVEN FUCKING ZEROS. i don't care if the whole family would be taking the bus ad infinitum for our lack of a ride for the rest of our lives. there's no way bailing this crap out is the right way to make sure it doesn't happen again in our lifetimes. (how amazing this must be to those over 90, to have lived through this same incredible gargantuan fraud twice in their lifetimes, though, as i think about it, that would be kinda like those over 50 who've seen the first-vietnam-and-now-iraq story first-hand...)

santayana wasn't kidding about that "doomed to repeat it" thing, was he.

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

as it should be

sox clinch, and it's wake on the mound for the win to do it. as it should be. all likelihood he's asked to pitch the season conclusion to save all the other arms, and then gets sent to the bullpen for the division series, but that's just all the more reason he's my idea of the best there is in professional athletics. tim wakefield. da man.

all hail.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

shoes and other feet

pains me to give too much credit to billy joel for any of his lyrics, but "just the way you are" has come to mind today, and i can't help but nod to the sentiment.

for years i labored in a relationship where nothing of what i was was of much value, especially relative to everything that i was not. (shame on me, right?) the crowning irony of where i've found myself today is that i think it's got as much to do with being lucky enough to be surrounded by people who love me "just the way i are", as from being any bit different, let alone better, than what i used to be. when they might ask me the secret of a long and happy life, should i be lucky enough to live this happy life long enough, and at the same time retain enough ken to have a clue about it, i think i'm going to tell them that my secret was/is choosing to make time for everyone to whom who i am is just what they need me to be--no more, and certainly not any less. (after all, this isn't about cutting corners and living down to low expectations). no penalties for well-intended encouragement to be earl's better person, mind you. just no "why can't you be more..." or any of the people who think that way about me. life's too short. and i promise the same to everyone else in return.

unfortunately, many people i know are caught in that vise of their own misjudgment, whereby "love" or some other such infatuation wound them up with someone(s) with whom they just shouldn't be, except for all the life-glue that's now keeping them together. (kids, for example, are about as sticky as anything yet invented). either they're a perennial "project" for someone else's home's improvement, (and, boy, do i feel for those guys, and, yeah, most of those are guys), or else they realize that what they need can never come from whom they need it most, because those folks will simply never be that, or there. (it's a conundrum why half the world might be never judged good enough, while the other half is stuck with people who truly aren't, kinda like how half the world wants more sex while the other half can't stand the thought...)

know what i think? i think people are crazy. i think they wind up with people who aren't what they should have known they should want--only nobody ever told them or us how to know our hearts and our minds and our needs well enough to recognize the proper embodiment of our happiness.

lucky for me, my shoes are on their other feet now, and they're really very comfy. i know quite a few people who are or were unacceptable to others for one reason or another, and, funny enough, the best reason i know for caring about them as much as i do is usually the exact same reason they were spurned in the first place. (if you've never had sex with someone denigrated in other situations for being too interested in sex, then let's just say you should have that for which to look forward). crazy people. drunkards. even (hardest of all for me at first) stupid people. and you know what? they're *all* good people. take it from one of the worst of all. (crazy, drunk, stupid, you name it).

nothing better than to hear "i love you just the way you are" and know it's true.

Monday, September 22, 2008

he said it

bear with me, because i'm transcribing a spoken statement verbatim, (from tonight's cbs evening news, and, please, don't ask me why i was watching), and it's somewhat hard to follow on a grammatical level, let alone on a sensible level, but just follow along as best you can...

"part of what a leader does, is to instill confidence; is demonstrate that he or she knows what they're talking about, and communicates to people--'if you listen to me, and follow what i'm suggesting, we can fix this'--and when the stock market crashed, franklin roosevelt got on television..."

yep, that's right, mr. joe biden, son of a coalminer, (oh, wait, that was the speech he plaigiarized from that english dude), i mean, son of a car salesman, (you know you can't make this stuff up), wants us to think that franklin roosevelt was talking on tv about the crash all the way back in 1929--even though fdr wasn't sworn in as president until 1933, not to mention the fact that the first commercially licensed tv stations didn't appear until after 1941... (i looked it up).

don't get me wrong, i believe both presidential candidates to be impressive and honorable men. but these veep picks... they are just so incredibly bad that only their own words can do justice to 'em.

how 'bout them dinosaurs, sarah?

i may be old but your music really does suck redux

t-shirt caption of the week, from the bronx and yankee stadium's farewell (appropriately meaningless) baseball game: "hey red sox fans, there never was a curse, your team just sucked".

that's both funny, and true, which is what makes it funny. we like to believe in our home town boys, and there's much of which to be proud, but you win it on the field, and, from '19 to '03 it's fair to say the sox didn't. maybe "suck" is a harsh word, cuz there were a lot of teams in there that were pretty good, but if you define "suck" as "being eliminated at or before the final out of the world series", then you have to give it to the guy for calling it right. i think that's the beauty of this particular pejorative. it doesn't have to be literally true to be so much fun to use anyway.

so, isn't it great to be able to admire the pluck of one particular fan from a city that could be decades away from ever tasting the champagne again?

heheheheh.

you know what the yankees do.

:-)

the big city

i've recently been pleased to enjoy shows by a couple of grammy winners of long and productive careers. the first, at a relatively unknown park in a relatively unknown city, was rousingly well-attended, (levon helm), while the other, at an internationally reknowned concert venue in to what is so often referred as the athens of america, wasn't so much. (randy newman). i'm wondering this morning what might be the difference, observing that i thoroughly enjoyed, sat next to the same person at, and find the music equally enjoyable from, each...

ny likes to brag on its 26 baseball championships, though, at 10 times the population, that still wouldn't be at quota beyond boston's 5 during the same (old) century. (and that's not even talking about the 2-and-counting so far during this). and i think, when it comes to culture, the self-appointed hub of the universe might have some of lucy's splainin' to do when it comes to promoting and supporting music these days. even the dropkick murphys have played lelacheur more recently than fenway, whose latest occupant, if memory serves, might have been one mr. neil diamond...

i rest my case.

:-)

Sunday, September 21, 2008

the sublime of in it together

an undersized and under-skilled freshman, i gave up soccer to run cross-country (and then track) in high school. it wasn't completely my choice, as i had been cut from the jv soccer team, and it was also a conditioning coincidence that 2-a-days chasing a soccer ball do indeed put you into the kind of shape that impresses on the road course. my first race, run at the behest of a friend who wanted company doing, to be polite, the only thing to which he was athletically suited, got the cross-country coach so excited that he blandished me with sufficient compliments to convince me to buy my first pair of nike waffle trainers and fall into pursuit of the loneliness of the long distance runner. funny what can happen when you follow the influence of others...

i wasn't half bad, though not the prodigy that had been hoped. (runners never respect the conditioning that goes into a team sport, and who knew about soccer back then). i did become a respectable cog in the varsity cross-country wheel, which was nice, but it was doing something that really reinforced ones geek credentials more than ones athletic, and it was, as the afore-referenced short story title would indicate, not the most effective antidote for someone inclined at times to introversion. (yes, believe it or not, kad began life as an introvert, and you'll notice the vestiges all over the place if you pay attention).

so what has me in nostalgic mind this morning is recollection of the moment of singular joy, riding home from daughter's soccer game yesterday, when she told me with light in her eyes that she'd just had the most fun she's ever had on a soccer field. i could have cried and hugged her but for the consequence of doing such things at 80mph (don't tell the radar cops). and she had--i could have told you even before she said it.

teams are made up of individuals, and, as my daughter put it, (and it was remarkable to me that she could put it into words), there is no feeling in life as when a group of people puts aside all differences and other friendships to work together in success towards a common goal. and--and this was the defining moment--she knew that it didn't depend on success, either.

(to look into the eyes of ones own child and see a better self is to know the meaning of life).

the team had arrived at a field a very long distance at home to the news that five of their teammates were not going to be there for them that day. one had broken her foot during the first team practice, and had only been diagnosed the previous day, some two weeks after the fact. (i have no idea how some pediatricians keep their license). two had come down with acute viruses from what had been going around at school. two were removed by their parents to obligations unknown. so there were only exactly as many remaining as there would be places on the field, and there would be only each other for every minute until the final whistle. their opponents, confident on their home field, had sufficient substitutes to run the would-be soccer spartans off the field.

but, just as at thermopylae, a soccer field is only as wide as the positions on it, and no amount of excess on one side can change the numbers at the point of attack. they played within themselves, and within the finest tolerance of all of themselves, and they did it for each other. they fell behind once, and once they felt lucky to re-tie things, they fell behind again. but, the second time they pulled even, you could see the light go on in every one of them. earning the second goal was from hard work and faith in each other. a ball was pushed to space, where they knew a teammate was committed to be from practice and more practice, and, yes, there she was. 2-2. the third goal you could see was the inexorable irresistible force meeting an object that was melting away to realize that no excess of numbers could change those odds.

when people join gyms and pursue individual activities, even as part of a "team" or larger group, i always remember how it changed for me. in college, when our team went on to win the national championship, (ncaa division 3), i was infected again with the bug that has known no resistance in me ever since, because there can be none for me when such results are possible. i play because there is beauty in humanity working together. i play because there is always motivation to do more when the beneficiaries are ones friends and family and loved ones before onesself. i play because there is joy where none otherwise exists.

i marvel at those cross-country runners, that they can do it for themselves and overcome themselves in the process. i really do. honestly, for all my conditioning and (moderate) success at it, i can't do what they can do. i never could.

but i don't have to, because i am part of a team.

it took me 48 years to come to this realization, and to see that it may not take my children nearly as long is a beautiful thing.

to paraphrase dylan: "i'll let you be on my team if i can be on yours".

Friday, September 19, 2008

"reformers"

a helpful reader forwarded a ny times review of all those yahoo emails that were sent to and from governor sarah palin in lieu of actually using her official government email account. the quote that really scared the cheney out of me was this one:

an assistant told her it appeared that such e-mail messages sent to a private address on a “personal device” like a blackberry “would be confidential and not subject to subpoena.”

here's another one:

on feb. 7, frank bailey, a high-level aide, wrote to ms. palin’s state e-mail address to discuss appointments. another aide fired back: “frank, this is not the governor’s personal account.” (to which mr. bailey responded: “whoops~!”)

one of those appointments? ivy frye, age 27, of whom the ny times writes that "frequent interactions with ms. palin’s children have prompted some lawmakers to refer to her as “the babysitter". (state-paid salary: $68,664).

want to know why i think sarah palin fits in with the republican political machine? she commonly refers to her critics and opponents as "haters".

Thursday, September 18, 2008

the big names

glass-steagall
gramm-leach-bliley

the first pair sponsored a bill back in the 30's that regulated separation between banking, securities and insurance businesses, which worked for 60+ years, and never let us down.

the second trio sponsored a bill back in the 90's that erased that restriction, which worked for all of about 6+ years, and it's led us into yet another good ol' '29-style financial meltdown, which was why, coincidentally, glass and steagall had written their first bill in the first place.

here's where we are today: since a lot of banks (like wamu) wrote a passel of sub-prime mortgages (like the ones turning into the record number of foreclosures in your town this year) to be bundled into securities by a lot of investment firms (like bear stearns, lehman brothers and merrill lynch), and insured by a lot of insurance companies (like aig), the american taxpayer is on the hook for carl sagan's "billions and billions" of financial liability, while the senior bankers and stock brokers and insurers have all pocketed their ill-gotten gains and left their shareholders to twist in the wind.

does the name gramm ring a bell? yup, he's john mccain's senior financial advisor. oh, and, not by coincidence, john mccain was also one of the major supporters of gramm's bill when it got passed a few years back. but, trust him, today he's in favor of strong regulation.

can you spell k-e-a-t-i-n-g ???

i tried counting to 10, but i only got to 5 and i had to start all over again.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

i know i'm old, but your music really does suck

or, perhaps, "i know i'm a blue stater, but your red stater's campaign really is being run by idiots".

senior mccain staffer douglas holtz-eakin claimed recently (since frantically backtracked) that john mccain helped invent the blackberry.

so, as if that wasn't enough, ex HP ceo and senior mccain campaign advisor carly fiorina then opined (since frantically backtracked) that sarah palin lacked the experience to run a major corporation.

what they meant to say was... um...

do they actually have to pay jon stewart's writers for what he's putting on his show anymore?

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

more baseball

manny went 3 for 4 last night to raise his season batting average to .327 (i won't even bother to calculate all the other ratios because "they're just crazy high" is going to convey the same information with far less effort on my part) and for grins i pulled a list of the top-rated hitters in the league over the past month and was amused to find that manny is neither first overall, nor, even, tops among dodgers. both those honors would have to fall to one mr. andre ethier, promoted by one mr. joe torre over "big name" veterans like andruw jones and juan pierre to star in la's right field opposite the manny monster, and the rest is, as they say in the nl west in places like phoenix, arizona, too freakin' amazing to keep up with. (ethier is batting .396 over the past month, with 25 runs, 7 homers, 20 rbi and 3 stolen bases).

for a second there i had a shudder to think what the al east might look like had both manny and joe found their places in the bronx this year, but, happily, brian cashman just ain't that kind of baseball genius. wouldn't want to be facing the dodgers in another couple of weeks, that's for sure.

oh, yeah, they're still playing baseball...

the magic number for both the tampa bay (always will be devil) rays and our own home towne boston red sox, was reduced to 6 last night. for those who care about such things, the elimination number for the team from the city where they actually used the word "hooray" in their newspaper headlines to describe their reaction to an opponent ripping up their knee ligaments is down to a delectable 4, and, yeah, i do think that's a decent rationale for disliking their teams, so i'm using it among an uncounted number of others.

$200 million just doesn't buy you what it used to, i guess...

heheheheheh

fair and balanced

i've apparently offended some patriotic americans who object to my "partisan" (their word) "attack" (their word) on john mccain. "obama does it too" is apparently their most cogent rebuttal, but i'm paraphrasing, so perhaps i'm getting that part wrong, too. (oh, yeah, there was more about being strong on terrorism, but that was hard to hear over the quotes from the new commander in iraq about the "fragile and reversible" consequences of our "surge", and, yeah, i'm still pissed about that stuff).

look:

i'm not impressed with barack obama's fiscal policy proposals. i'm not sure he fully realizes the depth of the shit we're in. that's unfortunate, and certainly no reason to support the guy.

on the other hand, he's not calling himself a "maverick", and then hiring up every lobbyist from his side of the aisle and naming them to his campaign and transition teams. (timmons is the tip of the iceberg, and don't make me list the rest of them).

yeah, joe biden is a smarmy patronage pol from waaaaay back. he sucks as a veep pick. and he'd be a perfect reason not to vote for the enigma from illinois, only the wacko creationist "i can see russia from my back porch so i'm good with foreign policy" schoolmarm who favors library censorship and teaching kids that dinosaurs roamed the earth with adam and eve is about as effective a solution to that dilemma as has ever been posited. (build a road to the bridge to nowhere, anyone?)

i wish i didn't have to vote for any of 'em. i wish i could vote for a guy like ron paul, who actually GETS why our banking system is likely to end up hanging us all, if the federal deficit doesn't get us first. THAT's the kind of guy i want naming transition teams and federal regulators and budget chiefs. oh, and, (bonus), he's the kind of guy who would stop the $10 billion per month sink hole that is our iraq policy and actually use that money of ours to help *americans*, not strangers, first. (what a concept). and, to the families of the 5000 servicepeople killed in iraq, not to mention those of the other 30,000 already maimed or wounded, at least a fair funding of educational, health and other services in honor of their service and sacrifice.

i just wish people would educate themselves about their own candidate before complaining that others are trying to do it for them... i'm not making this stuff up! honest!

teaching old dogs, or spotting old leopards?

from john mccain's 9/15 statement on the financial markets:

"i am glad to see that the federal reserve and the treasury department have said no to using taxpayer money to bail out Lehman Brothers..."

of course, on april 9th, 1987, john mccain accompanied four other sitting senators, fully 1/20th of the most powerful legislative body in the world, and chose slightly different words to effectively intimidate regulators from action against lincoln savings and loan before it required a $5 BILLION federal bailout:

"one of our jobs as elected officials is to help constituents in a proper fashion. ACC [American Continental Corp, the holding company for lincoln s&l, run by charles keating, who had, to that date, contributed $112,000 to mccain's campaign funds and was the defacto political godfather of arizona] is a big employer and important to the local economy..."

so today we need to decide if he's indeed an old dog who has learned a new trick, or, if, in contrast, he might just be that old leopard whose melanoma spots could be more telling than his sound bytes. (hmmm... i wonder which financial services industry lobbyists have been named to senior campaign positions within the last week, (and for whose campaigns), whose names might begin with the letters bill timmons sr, and who might have led lobbying on behalf of recent bailout recipient freddie mac, and who might be joined on their transition team by (and this is too funny not to mention) an investment banker named lehman...)

we won't even get into mccain's announced assessment yesterday, in response to the black hole currently consuming the capital of wall street, that the overall economy is basically sound.

i'm not sure who will be the one to break it to john or to those of us who haven't been paying attention, but, once the capital is gone, we literally work for the chinese. (soveriegn wealth funds are scary beasts, and just watch which ones pick up the paper littering the wall street sidewalks in a few days).

Monday, September 15, 2008

here's how cynical i am:

for years, financial lobbyists have been bending the ears of people at places like the cato institute that privatizing social security is a legislative necessity. i even used to think that they weren't quite completely wrong, given that our government geniuses aren't necessarily the best folks to be fending for us into our retirement years, either. but, today, in light of how many hundreds of billions, if not trillions, it's going to take to put our financial system back onto solid footing, it occurs to me that one of the reasons these shysters could have been so eager to get ahold of the nation's social security stash was for the convenience of extending their little ponzi scheme that is what passes for our current investment and mortgage banking system a little longer for obvious self-serving (i.e. keep them out of jail) reasons.

now, don't get me wrong, i'm not saying that a private system of retirement saving isn't a good idea, i'm just pointing out the (should-be) obvious, that we've possibly and very narrowly averted handing over our wallet to some very sophisticated and unscrupulous con men who have been behind the multi-trillion-dollar dodge that once was our national economy. trouble is, by the time we finish writing the checks to unwind this whole mess, that wallet's likely to be more or less empty, anyway.

anyone tempted to cast a vote for one particular presidential candidate or the other in a couple of months would do well to tally up the number of financial lobbyists on their campaign staff, add in those connected to the oil/energy industry, and then finish up with a calculation of those connected in some way to the military/industrial complex. the candidate who has the fewest ought to be worth voting for, if for no better reason than to be the de facto lesser of two evils.

i can't help but go back to al gore's observation, that the only way out of this interconnected mess of national security, financial security and energy security is, simple enough, true energy independence within ten years. we can do it. go to t. boone pickens "pickens plan" site if you'd prefer a conservative approach, i know these sorts of observations offend folks who prefer conservative (republican) approaches.

this is no longer democrat or republican, people. this is politicians and their financial, oil and gas and military spending backers against the people, people. the answer isn't voting one side in over the other, but, rather, it's voting BOTH sides back to honest service to their constituents. don't decide to vote either ticket down the party line, or you're really just as bad as those on the other side you purport to oppose. coke vs pepsi is really sugar water vs drinking the water that is, in the end, far better for us, if only we'd stop listening to the commercials.

"as wicked as it may seem"

mondays are always best that start with a little music.

as much as marty might wish it, ("tim, you're a lucky man"), i think it's clear that, for many, "like a machinist who got caught in the machine" is the best way to describe the day. yeah, as much as i might feel like tim on a microcosmic personal level on any given day, there's no question that anybody who's been trading with lehman brothers lately is already part of an ongoing, slow-motion and staggering industrial accident. (no accident, either, but that's another long story). los angeles train wreck; russian airline crash; turkish ferry sinking; texas flood; new delhi bombing... they'd all be trivia today, if only people knew.

it occurs to me on mornings like these that most folks haven't had the "benefit" of my experience with balance sheets and financial markets. by way of background, instead of liberal arts, my disgust with over-studied foreshadowing, christ figures and onomatopoeia (nothing less encouraging to the arts than being forced to "like" them) drove me to business school out of high school, and the consequences, at least a little bit, did manage to stick with me. i learned that debits and credits are never positive, nor negative, (just the right and left sides of a "t" account), and that 2+2 is never 4 in accounting, but, rather, anything the accountant would like it to be. (ask me to tell you the joke sometime, and you'll get more than you thought you were going to want to about accountants, just always remember that i was/am a finance guy). and in 20+ years of plying my finance-related software trade deep into the bowels of such beasts as lehman brothers, merrill lynch, pierce, fenner & smith, bank of america, fannie mae and freddie mac, (the list goes on, but those just happen to be the five most prominent in the financial pages these days, so we can stop there), a little bit of the bigger picture begins to emerge from the haze of disinsterest reserved for it by the vast majority of the people who are literally hostage their whole lives to the whole infernal system, yet never really know it as clearly as they should.

"too big to fail" is the mantra that the robber barons of wall street have driven into the enslaved minds of our elected officials (via years of lobbying and strategic campaign contribution) and it'll play out yet again this week for a second time, you just watch. (fannie and freddie were the first, and, at as much as $200 BILLION, that first step was, indeed a doozy). you do know that's our money they're flinging at each other, don't you? $1000 apiece for every man, woman and child in this country, and more, if you're savvy to the interest on the bonds we'll be owing to the chinese for the rest of our natural born days.

yes, let's put $200 BILLION into perspective. we'll start with the $5 billion that we had to pay to allow the keating five to get off scot-free for the largest financial fraud in this nation's history, and then repeat something like it every year for 40 years, and--guess what!--it still wouldn't add up to half of the mess at fannie and freddi, not to mention lehman, nor, ever, indeed, get close to paying the whole thing off at all. (time value of money, you should read more about it). see, at the end of flushing $5 BILLION down the toilet every year FOREVER, we'd still end up owing more than when we started. in fact, we'd have to get towards paying $10 billion a year just to service the interest on the debt alone, without even talking about starting to pay it off. kinda like credit cards, only, unlike credit cards, these shenanigans are being perpetrated by folks with private jets and summer palaces in the hamptons, who will still be flying around on their private jets to their summer palaces in the hamptons even after their malfeasances are put to light.

you can't even put a price tag on lehman brothers yet, as what the wall street journal describes as a "financial black hole" hasn't even begun to begin consuming the balance sheets of all the trading counterparties listed on their cratering books. like dominoes, after lehman is propped up, it's inevitable that the terms enforced will cause something else or other to topple. just set your watch.

all this isn't to frighten, as, we're in luck, the full faith and credit of the american people still buys a whole heck of a lot, and they haven't yet cleaned us completely out.

but consider this: at $10 billion PER MONTH in iraq, what george bush and his cronies have done to aid the people of iraq could have actually been used to bail out the people of america, (not to mention save the lives of 5000-and-counting servicepeople, prevent the catastrophic damage to the minds and bodies of 50000-and-counting maimed surviving servicepeople, and, and here's the crowning irony, actually save the lives of close to 100000-and-counting iraqis), but, and here's the joke, we're still too busy saluting our flag and calling each other "patriots" to be cognizant of the terrible fraud being perpetrated here.

someone again pointed out that, though oj poses little threat to your or my children, more is being spent pursuing a case against him (again) than will ever be spent trying to prosecute the people most culpable for the fact that your and my kids may very well have a hard time earning enough to afford a home mortgage when their time comes. it's all abstract and accounting to everyone, and we're still questioning our presidential candidates' "patriotism" rather than fairly judging which one of them (i still say ron paul, but i digress) is best likely to be able to do anything about this mess into which we're rapidly descending.

america is being looted right under our very noses, and i'm waiting patiently for someone to publish the full finances of wasalia, ak while sarah palin was mayor, so that we can figure out just what kind of a crock we're being sold here. trust me, i can absolutely guarantee you that joe biden's senatorial pork record will make sarah's original support for the bridge to nowhere seem tame by comparison. but THAT is the kind of information we need on these people, not how frequently they wear their flag lapel pins and claim to "support our troops".

want to know who supports our troops? learn the history of the original "gi bill", written by a republican and shepherded through the legislature by a democrat, and read about how strenuously their legacy is being attacked whenever it is proposed that we do more for our returning servicemen and women. these "patriots" running and wanting to run our country have no end of OUR money to spend bailing out our failing bankers, and causing the deaths of innocent civilians in the name of "freedom", but none left for things like armored personnel carriers, body armor, and a helping hand for those who might be lucky enough to survive without them.

today they are, indeed, as wicked as they may seem, and i'm once again so mad i could spit.

Saturday, September 13, 2008

my best friend's girl

a recent essay in the ny times global edition, written by allen salkin, pointed to tiny tim's excruciating falsetto rendition of tiptoe thru the tulips way back in the 60's for singlehandedly rendering the ukulele (ultimately temporarily, if myself and many others have anything to say about it) un-cool. which took a heck of an effort, considering that contemporary cultural manifestations of that tiny little agent of unconditional bliss at the time included then-recent images of marilyn monroe boopoopee do'ing her way through songs like "i want to be loved by you", which, as any fan can tell you, matters not a whit that she wasn't actually playing the thing as she sang them. (some like it hot is a hoot, if you haven't seen it recently). uke's were hot.

today, not so much.

but fear not!

today, for your viewing and listening pleasure, i have a link to offer of greg hawkes and distinguished company (other members of ukulele noir, whose esteemed roster includes the incomparable melvern taylor, though not on this track, who i shall neglect to name by name before i learn exactly who they are) playing through a sweet and straight-up version of "my best friend's girl". yup, *that* greg hawkes, once keyboardist extraordinaire of the cars, playing perhaps their signature tune in a way that can't help but warm the proverbial cockles.

enjoy!

what is and what should never be

had a fascinating exchange the other day with someone who we can just refer to as mother theresa in a sundress (either that or an expensive cami, but i'm trying to keep this g-rated) and we got around to discussing my particular quirk about being conditioned not to be comfortable receiving gestures of kindness, let alone love. i think i've hinted here about how i've come to understand this as one of the most selfish parts of me, if you can follow my meaning, but more on that in a moment.

her reaction to uncovering my selfish little secret was genuine surprise that i would hold her unconditional expressions of kindness, affection, and, who knows, even love, with such high regard as much for their kindness, affection, and, who knows, even love, as for what i perceived to be their precious rarity in this great big wonderful world of ours. imagine knowing someone who can't even conceive of the absence of caring, copiously and unconditionally, for everyone in her life. imagine someone who could hear of my sad little stories, and have her heart break, for even a moment in my life of not knowing unconditional kindness, affection, and, you know it, love.

the point at which we each arrived, she from her incredulity that love is not understood to be the default human setting, and me from my experience that love is, indeed, not necessarily understood to be the default human setting, at least when it comes to demonstration, was to marvel that a very nice solution would be so easy if only people were better at *receiving* love. who knew--to fix the world, and this is pretty clear to both of us, we don't have to go around telling people to be better people, and to be more loving, blah blah blah, but we only have to convince people to be better at simply *receiving* those acts of kindness, affection, and, indeed, love. "be selfish", as it were. me, i think jesus should have been a bit more clear about "the greatest of these is love" bit, so he could have hinted that love is in both giving AND the receiving. every sunday morning on those hard pews at church, and my whole life for that matter, would have turned out a whole lot different, i think.

here's how the cycle got so broken in my life, that i wound up (at least temporarily) wounded and alone: kid raised by the union of german calvinist discipline with skinflint yankee self-reliance is taught never to accept as charity anything one could do for ones self. (we were supposed to serve god and his creation, not the other way around). the clearest memory of grandparental reaction to tears of any sort is the admonition that "that's beautiful music, and when you cut it out, we can get you down to the hospital for those stitches" (or "resume doing what you're told", as the case may be). gifts of any kind, whether tangible, in observation of a birthday or christmas, or intangible, as with a kind, affectionate or loving gesture, were immediately the subject of discussion as to the specific obligation incurred upon receipt. from thank-you notes, to actually having to say "no, thank you, i can manage", there was never a lesson on how to simply let a feeling of kindness, affection, or, heaven forbid, love cause a lapse in protocol.

fast-forward to married life, where, early on, dinner might have been put on the table prior to a spouse coming home. (funny how this particular story did actually turn up in both mother t's as well as my past). what does said spouse do, and feel? if you're broken, like i am, you might feel uncomfortable, and further replay the lessons of a liberal education in your head, and feel like, "gee, that's a sexist stereotype, and we ought not to fall into that pattern" or something like that. and so, regardless of whether or not you might have truly appreciated a prepared meal at the end of a work day, you don't go down that road of letting yourself feel that true appreciation, let alone show it to the one who worked that stove for awhile to afford you the privilege. so the chef gets no love or gravy for their trouble. (the german/yankee pragmatist would say, "charity is its own reward--get over it"). and they feel like what they've done has been a chore--unvalued and unappreciated, and, because they also likely are playing that liberal education stereotype thing in their own head, they grow a little callous where that love-and-affection reflex used to be, and sooner or later they don't fire up that stove in anticipation of their evah-lovin' comin' home at 5. (well, most likely 7 because this evah-luvin is one of those protestant work ethic types, but that's a selfishness discussion for another time).

it all crystalized for me while i was trying to be earl's better person and save my beyond-saving marriage. see, dishes have always been anathema to me, ever since they were the embodiment of "i don't wanna" among me and my siblings. yeah, dusting on saturday mornings when we could have been out playing was just as loathsome, but that only came once a week, and that hot and finger-pruning slimy dishwater was every single freakin' night. so i hated doing 'em even more than most folks would hate doing 'em, and it didn't matter that the older me had a dishwasher thanks to all those 7pm returns from work, i just had this bizarre semi-subconscious mental psychosis that i'd do anything before i'd move one glass from the sink to that top rack. and would it have made me feel loved that she put those dishes, each and every night, into that top rack *for* me??? of course not!!! it only made me feel, deep down inside, loathsome and lazy, (that calvinist work ethic again) and we all know how quickly we become averse to facing those who make us feel loathsome and lazy, even if it's absolutely nothing to do with them that we're all loathsome and lazy at times in our lives.

so that moment of crystal clarity came when i realized that having glassware and other dishes put into that top rack *for* her made HER feel loved. quelle surprise!!! done dishes wouldn't have made me feel loved, (just relieved it didn't have to be me doing them), of course, as we've covered in all that self-loathing stuff in the last paragraph, but it would have made HER feel loved... and here i was, the most selfish person in the world, physically incapable of feeling the kindness, affection and, indeed, love, that putting dishes into dishwashers represents (because, as any german yankee can tell you, dishes have to be cleaned, and cleanliness is part of that godliness thing that we're all talking about) and, insult to injury, singularly incapable of doing them myself.

EUREKA!

dishes weren't a chore! dishes were, perhaps, the single easiest and quickest way to endear myself to someone to whom i craved to be endeared! and endearing ones self to someone to whom you crave to be endeared feels GOOD! for both of you! see, this all could have worked because she equated dishes with love, and though she'd have had to find something else *i* enjoyed, like, say, home prepared food, to make it work for her, it was right there for me in plain sight--the answer to my life's longing.

see, we all want to feel loved. i could have had it all for the simple trivial gesture of doing her dishes, coupled with letting myself feel cared-for when i had a meal prepared for me when i got home, and saying how much i appreciated it. simple!

my mt-in-a-sundress friend was dumbstruck by how incredibly freakin' stupid it is that somebody actually didn't realize this. (there were two of us involved in that train wreck of a marriage, actually, and, yeah, she got that right). however, in my defense, true confessions proved that, earlier in her life, her train had also fallen off that very same track, too, and none of us is ever perfect.

so here's what i know now: the most loving thing you can do--even more loving than making that "selfless" sacrifice that chances are you're really only doing so that you can tell yourself how "loving" you are to be doing it--is to let someone who loves you DO for you. dishes. dinner. gifts. sexual favors. you name it. gordon-gecko it up! greed is good! just don't forget to relish how it feels. bathe in it. savor it. sip it and let it spread all around in your mouth like the nectar of the gods it truly is. and LET THEM KNOW.

because, here's what i know about me--i'm not an un-generous person. i like to do things for people. i love it when they tell me how much they appreciate it, because it makes me feel good, just like the calvinists said it would. and when i feel good, i want to do it *more*. i even loved to do the dishes for a year or two there. 'cept i don't have to do that anymore because the people with whom i'm filling my life these days are the kind of people who will compete for me for the privilege. and who would i be, but selfish, not to let them load up that dishwasher, and then tell them how much i truly adore the way such care makes me feel.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

that sexy librarian thing

craig ferguson is having some fun about it with sarah palin, but i'm rather talking about the authentic kind--you know, the kind that doesn't (apparently) favor automatic weapons and the belief that dinosaurs somehow were around to get named by adam, yet not eat him and every other contemporary hairless mammal after the fall (do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup) while they were at it. (and you'd think noah or one of the other folks on board would have had something colorful to say about that pair of eighty foot brontasauri below deck that would have made the official god-inspired record, but i digress...)

so about that sexy librarian thing...

one of the most wonderful things about this world of ours, or at least the better-civilized parts of this great country of america, is the free library. you can read today's paper, this week's people magazine, or this month's bestselling tome on the subject of tori spelling, (can you believe that this is what we are reading????), and not have to pay a nickel for the privilege. what could be better than that! cd's... dvd's... books... microfiche back-copies of the lowell sun from 1878... it's all there. and all fronted by your friendly, neighborhood sexy librarian.

ok, i'm making that sexy part up. that is, after all, the part that's in our own heads, much like our rationale for actually paying money to read about the life and times of tori spelling, and not anybody else's business. but the librarian part is way cool, and, actually, when you think about it, good grounds for considering somebody sexy anyway, even if they're not, because they can bring you everything you always wanted to know about sex, but were afraid to ask. (though you have to be unafraid to ask if you want his or her help to find reuben's misguided little experiment to explain the impersonality of male homosexual liaison, or the "cure" for female frigidity...)

where was i?

OH!

so you know what you can ask for and receive? (receive, as in, wait for it to arrive from the boston public library on loan). a just-for-you copy of the ukulele song book: in notation and tablature, compiled by ron middlebrook. and running through your head, while you're looking at the pertest and most helpful little old lady librarian there is as you ask, are the sweet strains of marilyn monroe from that cool dutch reverese karaoke machine web site, singing boopoopee do and reminding you that everybody was young, once...

every time i pick up that little wooden panacea to all my pains and my ills, and hear the little nylon strings plunk happily along as best as i can make them, i'm young, too.

"i want to be loved by you
just you
and nobody else but you
i want to be loved by you
alone

(boopoopee do)

i want to be kissed by you
just you
and nobody else but you
i want to be kissed by you
alone

i couldn't aspire
to anything higher
than to fill my desire
to make you my own

i want to be loved by you
just you
and nobody else but you
i want to be kissed by you
alone

(boopoopee do)

:-)

today is...

today is the seventh anniversary of my sincerest longing, to have known what the world would have been like had al gore been elected president in 2000.

the points al makes when he speaks today--that our energy, financial and security crises must be solved together by 100% energy independence within 10 years--are stirring to me in their calls to patriotism, self-reliance and renewed liberty. and because they are brilliant and right. (t. boone pickens agrees, and so should we all).

i'm saddened that there wasn't a man wise enough on hand to have declared the tragedies in ny, washington and pennsylvania seven years ago an attack on wider civilization in total, and not just this increasingly self-centered and off-the-track nation of ours. because it was. and because calling on the world to follow the best of america, (its goodness), instead of it's worst, (its recent aggression and abuse of power), would have made things profoundly different everywhere there is now fear and suffering. our armed forces would have, indeed, been welcomed and respected everywhere in the world, instead of misunderstood and feared. the men and women who have *always* been the best of america, would be secure in knowing that their sacrifices were recognized and revered the world over, and not just among us grateful citizens.

no "terrorist" could have done the damage to this country that this "patriot" act and corollary executive orders have done. it will be years more to undo it, if, indeed we have vision and courage to elect men and women who will take on the task and succeed. a building could be knocked down every day, and still not put a dent in the wealth and goodness that exists here, as a beacon for all the worlds tired, poor and huddled masses. we were once told we have nothing to fear but fear, yet now, as randy newman observes, we are told that we *must* fear... and we should KNOW that this is wrong. doesn't anybody stop to realize that our "enemy", such as it is, can't even build a building??? they can only knock them down, and there is no competing with us with only that. (we won a cold war against far greater capabilities than this at far less cost of life).

we are the proudest and freest nation of earth. we should fear no one, nor anything. we should rely on our determination and our work ethic and our belief in what is right, and we should hold that up as an example for the world to follow. we should not forget the christian ideals to let our love conquer others' hate, nor should we forget the muslim ideals of service to mankind. (nor the ideals of the full range of races, creeds, religions and beliefs here in this great free nation of ours).

why are we not doing our sacred duty in darfur? why are we not aggressively confronting the threat of unchecked violence posed by the government of north korea? (they discovered yet another missle base there under construction). why are we slave to our thirst for oil, when we have the know-how and the resources to build a nation self-sufficient AND FREE of all foreign energy dependence???

today is the day i resolve yet again not to forget all these things, and the tragedy of lives cut short by a struggle that should never be. only we can change this conflict.

so lets change it for the better.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

why i love the ukulele

i also love the dutch. check out:

http://www.sheep-entertainment.nl/ukulele/index.html

hit the pink pick with the "play along songs go!" on it. among lots of tasty tracks in reverse-karaoke format, there's a recording of marilyn monroe singing "i want to be loved by you", complete with all the chord fingerings so you can learn to play along. i haven't yet had time to play around with the tool, but it would appear some very enterprising dutch programmer has set up everything you need to reverse-engineer all your favorite songs. i am definitely going to lose a lot of the rest of my life on this one.

[Gm] poopoobee [C7] doo

spinnahs / muckdogs for all the mahbls

because i know you lost your link to the sun sports page, and would have looked it up yourself if only you could have:

last night the spinners erupted for six runs through their first six innings, and held a 6-2 lead with just four muckdog frames to finish. except their normally solid pitching staff coughed up 11 runs over the course of the next six outs, and they finished on the foul side of a 13-6 score.

the rubber game is tonight down in batavia, and it's for all the marbles. a win brings 'em back to lelacheur for potentially TWO more this coming weekend, (the winner of the other series was the wild card, jamestown, so either lowell or batavia will enjoy home field advantage in the final round), or a loss just means that the world's most perfect baseball evening will stand as the capstone to a wonderful summer season.

go spinnahs!!!

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

brigadoon

last night at lelacheur park it was baseball brigadoon. the last playoff game within the city limits was in 1934, (from 1935, except for the '47 season, there hasn't even been a team in lowell, until the first incarnation of the spinners returned in '95) and the park was full to savor and enjoy it. the weather couldn't have been more beautiful, nor the green grass brighter, happy to have had one of the moistest summers ever to keep it lush. so many times throughout the evening i just had to sit back in my seat, look up and all around, and feel the favors of providence.

the very first spinner at-bat it was my pleasure to see this year, way back in june, was ryan dent's lead-off home run against the vermont lake monsters. last night, in the bottom of the twelfth inning, he came to the plate again, this time with the bases loaded. he'd already walked three times on the evening, which was especially impressive since the batavia pitchers had struck out well more than a dozen, including 7 through the first 3 innings. and he worked his patient magic again, drawing the winning base on balls to force home the difference in the game.

it had been a classic '08 spinners gem. they earned a run in the first without even getting a hit, and hung on through brutal stretches of batting futility to come up, down 3-1, in the bottom of the 8th. a two-out double by peter hissey and an rbi double by mitch dening halved the difference, and then, in the bottom of the 9th, when they had to have it, will middlebrooks hit only his second homer of the entire season against the muckdogs fireballing closer to tie the game. (the guy was tossing 97's on the radar gun, and nobody else was even coming close).

the extra innings were all lowell's, with threats in each until dent finally walked them over the top. their pitching, even including weiland's hiccup in the sixth, was unbeatable. (an error cost them an easy double play which would have made it no on and two outs, instead of two on and no outs). their last guy, lance mcclain, went 2 1/3 shutout innings for the win. as was fitting, though ricardo burgos had been the one to miss the key double play, it was he who smashed the leadoff double in the 12th that enabled the bunt to get him to third and cause the two intentional walks that set ryan dent up for the coup de grace.

spinners 4, muckdogs 3. if it's another almost 75 years, there still won't have been a better night at the ball park.

Monday, September 08, 2008

fabuloso

one of the sweetest upsides to condo living, beyond never driving to the store anymore, is encountering those little yellow bubble mailers in your mail box--you know, the ones containing those hard-to-find cd's you wait patiently for days to receive once you've ordered 'em online, because you couldn't get 'em and your instant gratifcation on amiestreet. well, today's thrill is "fabuloso" by melvern taylor, and it sure is a good 'un.

i'm trying to think of classic differences of human opinion for a suitable example. you know, coke/pepsi, democrat/republican, less filling/tastes great... there's nothing that i can think of that captures exactly the existential conundrum posed by "angel on my shoulder" vs. "two little bottles of beer":

she was charming townies at the worthen house
i was busy gettin drunk and hangin out
i would-a took her offer but i had my doubts
uh huh

endless nights and camel lights and junked out dames
oversights of body types and christian names
i medicate the causes of my aches and pains
with money i was savin for rent

and it's a bad day for the angel on my shoulder
the competition is winning me over
the promises of a chance to get to hold her
one more time again
one more time again

i was sittin at the bar with i don't know
runnin out of cigarettes and gettin broke
i never should have started on the rum and coke
but i guess i never can say no

and it's a bad day for the angel on my shoulder
the competition is winning me over
the promises of a chance to get to hold her
one more time again
one more time again

and it's a bad day for the angel on my shoulder
the competition is winning me over
the promises of a chance to get to hold her
one more time again
one more time again

she was lookin hungry when she first came in
a hundred pounds of silicone and heroin
i bought us both a couple rounds of gib-a-leys gin
and i woke up with a headful of hurts
and i'd tell you but the story gets worse...

OHhh

vs.

one little two little bottles of beer
i said what you wanted to hear
i can't believe
that you'd up and leave
over two little bottles of beer

one little two little bright yellow pills
i swallowed them just for the thrills
and i never thought
that we would have fought
over two little bright yellow pills

i know i told you i was up on the wagon
but we both know that it ain't true
don't you get tired of your fussin and naggin
ain't you got nothing else to do

whoa whoa whoa

one little two little nights on the town
i was showin some old friends around
i came home late
now you're bent out of shape
over two little nights on the town

one little two little bottles of beer
i said what you wanted to hear
i can't believe
that you'd up and leave
over two little bottles of beer

over two little bottles of beer
it was just two little bottles of beer


the classic solution is to buy both cds and let the tunes duke it out in your own head, or, if you like, you can come on over and listen for yourself right here in beautiful downtown shangri-lowell.

yup, that's a jen-you-wine hilo ukulele, straight from hawaii via the guitar center in nashua (some things you can't trust to online purchasing) hanging from the other little treat i received today, this time courtesy of my friendly neighborhood ups man, right there over by the sofa.

c'mon in, set a spell, and have

"one little, two little bottles of beer..."

routine?

i find no other date on the calendar more disruptive to whatever had been passing itself off as routine as i do labor day. it's "back to school", of course, but it's also shorter daylight, (no more wednesday night soccer games), new tv patterns, (mad men and the shield already, and we haven't even gotten back to the new network shows), and a whole renewed vigor at work. (the germans are all back from their august holiday). for my part, i'm taking every remaining day in shorts and sandals as a blessing, and each precious leisure moment as a gift, though already i'm looking at some days with four can't-miss conflicts down my september gauntlet, and it's only going to get more hectic from here. i know my priorities, but sometimes even that isn't enough.

most troublesome, of course, is the ripple effect that ubiquitous schedule-change has on relationships. i've had a sublime summer of friends and family, (not to mention music, soccer, baseball, and 100 other wonderful things), but now that there can be (sometimes) weeks between potential time together within my happy summer social circle, i realize that there is a lot at stake. my priorities remain with my children, which i'm sure causes others to notice i'm not around as much for them as a consequence. i wonder how much of what i perceive in reverse is due to that same sort of simple math, that there are only 24 hours in a day, and 7 days in a week.

the good news, of course, is that it's an easy opportunity to re-focus on the things and people that matter, even if we'll need to rely on them to be understanding when we aren't with them as often as we'd prefer. like today, (another glorious day in shorts), i'm reminding myself right now to savor every moment.

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

manny vs dustin

since august 1st:

ramirez--46 hits in 111 ab's with 19 bb's, including 10 hr's, 7 2b's and 2 sb's. that's a .414 avg, .500 obp, .748 slg and an ethereal 1.248 ops. he's raised his season avg a whopping 27 points to .326, and he just keeps getting hotter. (22r, 29rbi)

meanwhile, back at the ranch...

pedroia--51 hits in 128 ab's with 12 bb's, including 8 hr's, 12 2b's, a 3b and 6 sb's. that's a .398 avg, .450 obp, .695 slg and an mvp 1.135 ops. he's raised his season avg an impressive 17 points to an american league-leading .333, and done it with half the rest of his order out with one ailment or another. (37r, 28rbi)

it's been a great month to be a baseball fan.

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

e-u-ooooo-k

this isn't a sox paean, (since, this week, if it were, it'd be about dustin, not kevin), this is an homage to the uniquely hawaiian, yet now also distinctly lowellian (props melvin) pleasure of the ukulele. (pronounced "uhk-ah-leh-leh" if the web videos of all the helpful hawaiians advising on how to string, tune and play them are to be believed).

the long version of the story starts with my indulging myself a new guitar (gretsch 5120 hollow body, black) for my birthday. it plays great. it plays so great, i could barely put it down all weekend while hanging out here with the kids, and, as a consequence, i ended up giving chord lessons to a couple of budding and eager guitar enthusiasts, and sending off my vintage yamaha acoustic with the (renewed) converts.

the shorter version picks up with the empty space on the wall now that the sunburst stand-by is on its tour, and the thought that having a serviceable spare here in lowell would save having to schlep the other back and forth for practicing and fatherly tips.

the shortest version joins our hero in the friendly, humidity-controlled confines of the acoustic room of the nashua, nh guitar center, running the various budget-priced fenders and yamahas through their paces. (yamaha wins again). on the way out with my new blonde, spruce-topped and bargain-priced dreadnought, it was noticed, over the door, a richly and warmly-hued mahogany soprano uke with the budget (tax-free!) sales price of $35. nothing so much as the appearance of a toy between all the other full-sized git-tars, but i'd just spent 30 minutes singing melvern taylor tunes in my car, and i knew the potential magic held within those little nylon strings, and i couldn't resist.

so here it is. i've got melvern's "love songs for losers" playing in my ear buds, and i've already got the first two chord progressions of "only one for you" figured out. it's only a matter of time until it's tiny bubbles all over shangri lowell.

Monday, September 01, 2008

the boast of lowell

charles cowley, esq., "a member of the middlesex bar", penned a "hand book of business in lowell with a history of the city" in 1856. already by that point in its early history, both the city and this account sported the city seal, expressing that "art is the handmaid of human good". (though the encircled illustration appears more bucolic than in the later incarnations i've seen). published by e.d. green, esq., a copy of the little book was bequeathed by the same to the harvard college library, from whence google came to digitize it so that all could read. and it's a very pleasant read, as a matter of fact, and it never fails to reward, right to the end. cowley's closing quote:

"it is the boast of lowell that it has no aristocracy, either of wealth or talent, or of rank or position. it is simply a city of mechanics, who have made the world ring with their achievement".

politics ad nauseum

it occurs to me this morning, reading a la deja vu the gulf weather report, that its all become a caricature of itself. i also realize that i have no interest in either vice presidential nominee coming anywhere near the button or the bully pulpit.

one's a career politician too whatever he is to ever be seriously considered for the position, or to be listened to without feeling an overwhelming desire to wash ones hands, while the other's barely a half dozen years away from mortgaging away the future of her town of 6,715, thinking nothing of racking up their debt to nearly $20m in six years, while firing the town librarian who coincidentally had supported her election opponent. (she was nearly but not successfully recalled for that one, though today's monegan story has yet to be fully written, so there may indeed be a second act in that particular american life).

so do we pick the guy who picked the guy who called him "the first mainstream african-american who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice looking guy"? (which was better, i guess, than when he more than paraphrased neil kinnock's coal mining schtick, so at least we're trending in the right direction). on do we pick the guy who picked the gal whose entire resume seems to be that she's pro life, pro gun and pro republican, though not quite capable of winning the miss alaska title against what few opponents one has for such a thing?

what about either of these qualifies either of them to be considered for one of the hightest offices in the land?

i don't want a prevaricatively glib senator for apparent life running my budget any more than i want someone who can't even balance a tiny hamlet's checkbook. heartbeats being what places such people away from the presidency, i think this is the election best decided by a really close look at the actuarial tables. (pitting smoking vs skin cancer, which doesn't say much better for our chances than the way most folks from the ninth ward are feeling this morning about the weather report).